<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Coils of the Serpent Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coilsoftheserpent.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coilsoftheserpent.com/blog</link>
	<description>Pattern of Life in Documents of Antiquity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:37:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Macroevolution explained by hybridization by koolokamba</title>
		<link>http://coilsoftheserpent.com/blog/?p=6&#038;cpage=1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>koolokamba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coilsoftheserpent.com/blog/?p=6#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your positive comments about my book.  I do think that the theory it presents is a better explanation of evolution than is the one offered by traditional neo-Darwinism. I also think that biology will only progress when biologists stop being so defensive and face the facts documented in the fossil record -- even if it means eating a little crow and admitting that the creationists, have been right about certain issues. What&#039;s needed is to construct explanations of available data in terms of known phenomena. Certainly, we biologists should not ignore or dismiss fossil data simply because it&#039;s inconsistent with the things we were taught in school. Anyway, thanks again!

Gene McCarthy
Ph.D. Genetics
www.macroevolution.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your positive comments about my book.  I do think that the theory it presents is a better explanation of evolution than is the one offered by traditional neo-Darwinism. I also think that biology will only progress when biologists stop being so defensive and face the facts documented in the fossil record &#8212; even if it means eating a little crow and admitting that the creationists, have been right about certain issues. What&#8217;s needed is to construct explanations of available data in terms of known phenomena. Certainly, we biologists should not ignore or dismiss fossil data simply because it&#8217;s inconsistent with the things we were taught in school. Anyway, thanks again!</p>
<p>Gene McCarthy<br />
Ph.D. Genetics<br />
<a href="http://www.macroevolution.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.macroevolution.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
